E4 Evaluation Army

E4 Evaluation Army: Mastering the Art of Performance Appraisal in the Military

Are you ready to revolutionize your unit's performance evaluation process? The E4 Evaluation Army isn't just about filling out forms; it's about fostering growth, improving readiness, and building a stronger, more effective team. This comprehensive guide dives deep into the intricacies of E4 evaluations within the military, providing actionable strategies and insights to maximize their impact. We'll cover everything from understanding the evaluation process to crafting effective feedback and leveraging these evaluations for career advancement. Get ready to lead your soldiers to success, one evaluation at a time.

Understanding the E4 Evaluation: More Than Just a Form

The E4 evaluation, often considered a crucial stepping stone in a military career, is far more than a simple performance review. It's a powerful tool for identifying strengths, highlighting weaknesses, and fostering professional development. It serves as a formal assessment of a Soldier's performance, leadership potential, and overall contribution to the unit. Understanding its significance is the first step towards mastering the E4 evaluation army.

The Importance of Accurate Assessments

Accuracy is paramount. An inaccurate evaluation can severely hinder a Soldier's career progression, while a fair and comprehensive assessment can propel them forward. This requires careful observation, detailed documentation, and a commitment to objective evaluation. Relying on anecdotal evidence alone is insufficient; concrete examples and quantifiable achievements are critical.

Key Components of the E4 Evaluation

The E4 evaluation typically covers several key areas, including:

Duty Performance: This assesses how well the Soldier performs their assigned tasks and responsibilities. Consider efficiency, accuracy, and initiative.
Leadership Potential: This evaluates the Soldier's ability to lead, motivate, and guide others, even in junior roles. Demonstrated leadership skills are crucial.
Professional Development: This section focuses on the Soldier's commitment to self-improvement, participation in training, and pursuit of professional growth.
Physical Fitness: Maintaining a high level of physical fitness is vital in the military, and this section assesses the Soldier's adherence to standards.

Building Your E4 Evaluation Army: Strategies for Success

Mastering the E4 evaluation process requires a proactive and strategic approach. Think of it as building an "army" of effectively evaluated Soldiers. Here's how:

Open Communication and Regular Feedback

Regular, constructive feedback is crucial. Don't wait until the evaluation period to address performance issues or highlight successes. Frequent check-ins and open communication foster a culture of improvement and transparency.

Documentation is Key: Tracking Performance Throughout the Year

Maintain meticulous records of your Soldiers' performance throughout the year. Document both positive contributions and areas needing improvement. Keep specific examples and quantifiable results to support your assessments. This provides concrete evidence to back up your evaluation.

Focus on Developmental Feedback: Improving Performance, Not Just Assessing It

The E4 evaluation shouldn't just be a retrospective assessment; it should be a tool for future growth. Focus on providing developmental feedback that helps Soldiers identify areas for improvement and sets clear goals for future performance.

Leveraging the Evaluation for Career Advancement

The E4 evaluation plays a vital role in career progression. A strong evaluation demonstrates a Soldier's readiness for advancement and enhances their chances of promotion. Highlight achievements and potential in your evaluations to showcase their capabilities.

Beyond the Form: The Human Element in E4 Evaluations

While the evaluation form is a critical component, never lose sight of the human element. Treat each Soldier as an individual, acknowledging their unique strengths and challenges. Fairness, empathy, and respect are essential ingredients in creating a positive and productive evaluation process.

Conclusion

Mastering the E4 evaluation army is not just about completing paperwork; it's about fostering a culture of growth, accountability, and excellence within your unit. By embracing open communication, meticulous documentation, and a focus on developmental feedback, you can transform the E4 evaluation into a powerful tool for building a stronger, more effective team. Remember, the goal is not just to evaluate performance, but to cultivate future leaders and contribute to the overall success of your military unit.

FAQs

1. What happens if I disagree with an E4 evaluation? You have avenues for appeal. Discuss your concerns with your supervisor and follow the chain of command to address any discrepancies.

2. How often are E4 evaluations conducted? The frequency varies depending on the branch and specific unit, but they are typically conducted annually.

3. Can I use the E4 evaluation to request specific training? Yes, the evaluation provides an opportunity to highlight areas where additional training would benefit the Soldier's development.

4. What are the potential consequences of a poorly written E4 evaluation? An unfair or inaccurate evaluation can negatively impact a Soldier's career prospects and morale.

5. Are there specific guidelines or templates for writing E4 evaluations? Yes, each branch and unit typically provides specific guidelines and templates to ensure consistency and accuracy in the evaluation process. Consult your unit's regulations for details.


  e4 evaluation army: Army Leadership and the Profession (ADP 6-22) Headquarters Department of the Army, 2019-10-09 ADP 6-22 describes enduring concepts of leadership through the core competencies and attributes required of leaders of all cohorts and all organizations, regardless of mission or setting. These principles reflect decades of experience and validated scientific knowledge.An ideal Army leader serves as a role model through strong intellect, physical presence, professional competence, and moral character. An Army leader is able and willing to act decisively, within superior leaders' intent and purpose, and in the organization's best interests. Army leaders recognize that organizations, built on mutual trust and confidence, accomplish missions. Every member of the Army, military or civilian, is part of a team and functions in the role of leader and subordinate. Being a good subordinate is part of being an effective leader. Leaders do not just lead subordinates--they also lead other leaders. Leaders are not limited to just those designated by position, rank, or authority.
  e4 evaluation army: Army , 1974
  e4 evaluation army: Army Logistician , 1976
  e4 evaluation army: Enlisted Evaluation System United States. Department of the Army, 1964
  e4 evaluation army: U. S. Army Board Study Guide , 2006-06
  e4 evaluation army: The 71F Advantage National Defense University Press, 2010-09 Includes a foreword by Major General David A. Rubenstein. From the editor: 71F, or 71 Foxtrot, is the AOC (area of concentration) code assigned by the U.S. Army to the specialty of Research Psychology. Qualifying as an Army research psychologist requires, first of all, a Ph.D. from a research (not clinical) intensive graduate psychology program. Due to their advanced education, research psychologists receive a direct commission as Army officers in the Medical Service Corps at the rank of captain. In terms of numbers, the 71F AOC is a small one, with only 25 to 30 officers serving in any given year. However, the 71F impact is much bigger than this small cadre suggests. Army research psychologists apply their extensive training and expertise in the science of psychology and social behavior toward understanding, preserving, and enhancing the health, well being, morale, and performance of Soldiers and military families. As is clear throughout the pages of this book, they do this in many ways and in many areas, but always with a scientific approach. This is the 71F advantage: applying the science of psychology to understand the human dimension, and developing programs, policies, and products to benefit the person in military operations. This book grew out of the April 2008 biennial conference of U.S. Army Research Psychologists, held in Bethesda, Maryland. This meeting was to be my last as Consultant to the Surgeon General for Research Psychology, and I thought it would be a good idea to publish proceedings, which had not been done before. As Consultant, I'd often wished for such a document to help explain to people what it is that Army Research Psychologists do for a living. In addition to our core group of 71Fs, at the Bethesda 2008 meeting we had several brand-new members, and a number of distinguished retirees, the grey-beards of the 71F clan. Together with longtime 71F colleagues Ross Pastel and Mark Vaitkus, I also saw an unusual opportunity to capture some of the history of the Army Research Psychology specialty while providing a representative sample of current 71F research and activities. It seemed to us especially important to do this at a time when the operational demands on the Army and the total force were reaching unprecedented levels, with no sign of easing, and with the Army in turn relying more heavily on research psychology to inform its programs for protecting the health, well being, and performance of Soldiers and their families.
  e4 evaluation army: Military personnel office, management, and administrative procedures United States. Department of the Army, 1971
  e4 evaluation army: Department of the Army Pamphlet , 1980
  e4 evaluation army: U.S. Army Recruiting and Reenlisting Journal United States. Army Recruiting Command, 1978-07 The Army recruiter's professional magazine.
  e4 evaluation army: The Evolution of US Army Tactical Doctrine, 1946-76 Robert A. Doughty, 1979 This paper focuses on the formulation of doctrine since World War II. In no comparable period in history have the dimensions of the battlefield been so altered by rapid technological changes. The need for the tactical doctrines of the Army to remain correspondingly abreast of these changes is thus more pressing than ever before. Future conflicts are not likely to develop in the leisurely fashions of the past where tactical doctrines could be refined on the battlefield itself. It is, therefore, imperative that we apprehend future problems with as much accuracy as possible. One means of doing so is to pay particular attention to the business of how the Army's doctrine has developed historically, with a view to improving methods of future development.
  e4 evaluation army: The Department of the Army Manual United States. Dept. of the Army, 1982 This manual describes Army roles, doctrine, organization, history and operations.
  e4 evaluation army: United States Army Combat Forces Journal , 1978
  e4 evaluation army: US Army Formal Schools Catalog United States. Department of the Army, 1979
  e4 evaluation army: Automatic Data Processing Equipment Inventory in the United States Government United States. Automated Data and Telecommunications Service, 1981
  e4 evaluation army: The Hallmark , 1972
  e4 evaluation army: Understanding Military Workforce Productivity Robert M. Bray, Laurel L. Hourani, Jason Williams, Marian E. Lane, Mary Ellen Marsden, 2014-03-24 From the stresses of repeated deployments to the difficulties of re-entry into civilian life, we are just beginning to understand how protracted conflicts, such as those in Iraq and Afghanistan, are affecting service members. Issues such as risky health behaviors and chemical dependence raise productivity concerns as they do with all organizations, but they also have a profound impact on the safety and readiness of troops--and by extension, the military as a whole--in life-or-death situations. Understanding Military Workforce Productivity cuts through the myths and misconceptions about the health and resilience of today's active-duty armed forces. This first-of-its-kind volume presents up-to-date findings across service branches in core health areas including illness and injury, alcohol and drug abuse, tobacco use, obesity, and mental health. The short- and long-term implications discussed relate to the quality of the lives of service members and their families, the quality and preparedness of the military as a workforce, and prevention and intervention efforts. The book: Presents data from ten large-scale health behavior surveys sponsored by the Department of Defense. Offers background context for understanding health and behavioral health and productivity among service members. Introduces a health and behavioral health model of productivity loss in the armed forces. Compares key indicators of substance abuse, health, and mental health in military and civilian populations. Reviews approaches for improving military productivity. Identifies areas for further study. Understanding Military Workforce Productivity offers a rare close-up of health issues in the services, making it an invaluable source of information for practitioners and researchers in mental health, substance abuse, health behaviors, and military behavioral health.
  e4 evaluation army: Inventory of Automatic Data Processing Equipment in the United States Government , 1972
  e4 evaluation army: Military Police Soldier's Manual, Skill Level 1 & 2 United States. Department of the Army, 1978
  e4 evaluation army: U.S. Army Recruiting and Career Counseling Journal United States. Army Recruiting Command, 1978 The Army recruiter's professional magazine.
  e4 evaluation army: Infantry , 1973
  e4 evaluation army: Mailing List (Infantry School (U.S.)) , 1975
  e4 evaluation army: The Army Personnel Proponent System United States. Department of the Army, 1998
  e4 evaluation army: The Department of the Army Manual United States. Department of the Army, 1979
  e4 evaluation army: Inventory and Summary of Federal ADP Activities United States. Automated Data and Telecommunications Service, 1973
  e4 evaluation army: United States Army Aviation Digest , 1977
  e4 evaluation army: The Changing Nature of Work National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Committee on Techniques for the Enhancement of Human Performance: Occupational Analysis, 1999-09-07 Although there is great debate about how work is changing, there is a clear consensus that changes are fundamental and ongoing. The Changing Nature of Work examines the evidence for change in the world of work. The committee provides a clearly illustrated framework for understanding changes in work and these implications for analyzing the structure of occupations in both the civilian and military sectors. This volume explores the increasing demographic diversity of the workforce, the fluidity of boundaries between lines of work, the interdependent choices for how work is structured-and ultimately, the need for an integrated systematic approach to understanding how work is changing. The book offers a rich array of data and highlighted examples on: Markets, technology, and many other external conditions affecting the nature of work. Research findings on American workers and how they feel about work. Downsizing and the trend toward flatter organizational hierarchies. Autonomy, complexity, and other aspects of work structure. The committee reviews the evolution of occupational analysis and examines the effectiveness of the latest systems in characterizing current and projected changes in civilian and military work. The occupational structure and changing work requirements in the Army are presented as a case study.
  e4 evaluation army: Armor , 1968
  e4 evaluation army: Monthly Catalogue, United States Public Documents , 1970
  e4 evaluation army: Army Reserve Magazine , 1973
  e4 evaluation army: Military Police , 1988
  e4 evaluation army: The Enlisted Evaluation System United States. Department of the Army, 1967
  e4 evaluation army: Impact of the Army Continuing Education System (ACES) on Soldier Retention and Performance Paul J. Sticha, 2003 This evaluation of the Army Continuing Education System (ACES) considered the following programs: (a) Tuition Assistance (TA); (b) Functional Academic Skills Training (FAST; (c) Military Occupational Specialty Improvement Training (MOSIT); (d) Noncommissioned Officer (NCO) Leader Skill Enhancement Courses; and (e) the Armed Forces Classification Test (AFCT). The assessment of the effectiveness of these programs is based on their ability to enhance soldier performance and increase the prospects of promotion, as well as to reduce attrition and increase reenlistment. The evaluation data came from a longitudinal administrative database that tracked a three-year accession cohort over a six-year period and an NCO database including self-reported participation in ACES programs, promotion information, and observed performance ratings. The analysis was designed to separate effects of participant characteristics from the effects of the program, and to control for differences in the opportunity and propensity to participate in ACES. Participation in TA and FAST were associated with an increase in the probability of first term reenlistment FAST participation was also associated with lower first-term attrition. Participation in several ACES programs showed positive effects on measures of performance and promotion potential.
  e4 evaluation army: Military Review , 2002
  e4 evaluation army: Update 12-6, Military Occupational Classification and Structure, Issue No. 6, June 26, 1995 , 1995
  e4 evaluation army: Military Construction Appropriations for 1972 United States. Congress. House. Committee on Appropriations. Subcommittee on Military Construction Appropriations, 1971
  e4 evaluation army: Military Construction Appropriations for 1972 United States. Congress. House. Appropriations, 1971
  e4 evaluation army: The Army Lawyer , 1981
  e4 evaluation army: Defenders Or Intruders? Daniel J. Nelson, 2019-04-10 Following Dr. Nelson’s A History of U.S. Military Forces in Germany; this book examines contemporary socioeconomic problems created by the stationing of U.S. troops in West Germany (FRG). The issues are magnified by the FRG’s strategic importance to the United States, the large number of U.S. troops stationed in the FRG, and the length of time they
  e4 evaluation army: Department of Defense Appropriations for ... United States. Congress. House. Committee on Appropriations, 1973
  e4 evaluation army: Department of Defense appropriations for 1980 United States. Congress. House. Committee on Appropriations. Subcommittee on Department of Defense, 1979
Evaluation Entry System (EES) 4.3.0 Release Hard-Stop and …
This evaluation cannot be submitted to HQDA until the rating period is corrected." Refer to current Army Evaluation Policy for concerns unrelated to the specific hard stops and soft stops listed in this user tool. AR 623-3 (Evaluation Report System), 14 June 2019. DA PAM 623-3 (Evaluation Report System), 27 September 2019

Army Evaluation Report Appeals and Formats - U.S. Army …
If you receive an evaluation report which you firmly believe is an inaccurate or unjust evaluation of your performance and potential, or one that contains administrative errors, that report may be a candidate for an appeal. Likewise, a report that was not rendered in accordance with the Army Regulation in effect at the

THE ARMY DRIVER AND OPERATOR STANDARDIZATION …
Sep 26, 2019 · C. Physical Evaluation Measures/Test Glossary _____ Chapter 1 Introduction 1-1. Purpose. This regulation establishes the Army Reserve’s standards, policies, and procedures for the selection, training, testing, and licensing of drivers and equipment operators of Army Motor Vehicles (AMVs), Army Combat

Personnel Evaluation Evaluation Reporting System
Report) to DA Form 67-10-4 (Strategic Grade Plate General Officer Evaluation Report) (para 1-1). o Updates policy authorizing officer evaluation reports for United States Army Reserve officers in the rank of major general (paras 1-7 and 3-2). o Incorporates Army Directive 2015-11, Unmasking of Army Officer Evaluation

MILPER Message Number 19-353 Proponent AHRC-PDV-PO …
Dec 3, 2019 · C. AR 623-3 (Evaluation Reporting System), 14 Jun 19. D. AR 640-30 (Photographs for Military Human Resources Records), 29 Mar 17. ... officer’s Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR) and their board file prior to board voting, assuming the evaluation is relatively free of errors. This suspense date is

Enlisted Evaluation System (EES) Frequently Asked Questions
Oct 4, 2017 · Paygrade E1-E3 E4 E5 E6 E7-E9 Current # of Competencies 19 25 25 25 25 Revised # of Competencies 9 13 13 13 15 2. Revised Competencies: New competencies and descriptions that better align performance standards with the Leadership Development Framework found in COMDTINST M5351.3 ... evaluation the individual is satisfactorily …

Army Enlisted Promotions - Army NCO Support
%PDF-1.6 %âãÏÓ 755 0 obj > endobj 760 0 obj >/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[6F0E7E167742D9FED3BDAEE02D310308>1E8DFCA695FFE5499F3260670F54E255>]/Index[755 11]/Info 754 0 R ...

Personnel Evaluation Evaluation Reporting System
Academic Evaluation Report)and DA Form 1059-1 (Civilian Institution Academic Evaluation Report) reports, when required (chapter 4). o Incorporates new Evaluation Entry Processing System for completing and submitting evaluation reports to HQDA (throughout). o Includes a new DA Form 67-10-1A (Officer Evaluation Report Support Form),

Today I’m going to provide you a detailed briefing of Module …
%PDF-1.5 %âãÏÓ 209 0 obj > endobj 224 0 obj >/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[38E7FC99647EEB439281244DFF209416>]/Index[209 22]/Info 208 0 R/Length 78/Prev 148321/Root 210 0 ...

Defense Primer: RDT&E - DAU
Apr 29, 2020 · Evaluation), which includes appropriations for the Army, Navy, Air Force, Space Force, a Defense-wide RDT&E account, and the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation. Space Force is a new account included in the FY2021 request. The Defense-wide account includes the Missile Defense Agency (MDA), Defense Advanced

ARMY SUBSTANCE ABUSE PROGRAM USAG ANSBACH APO …
administrative separation, or refer the Soldier to BH for a SUD evaluation by completing DA Form 8003 (Army Substance Abuse Program (ASAP) Enrollment). 10) Ensure company commanders refer any Soldier to BH for a SUD evaluation within 5 duty days of notification that the Soldier received a positive UA for illicit drug use. Commanders

Personnel Separations Physical Evaluation for Retention, …
Army Physical Disability Agency revisions to physical evaluation board findings, decisions of the Army Physical Disability Appeal Board, and decisions of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (paras 4-22d(4), 4-22 f, and 4-25 b(6)). o Changes title from U.S. Army Human Resources Command to U.S. Army Physical

Revised Noncommissioned Officer Evaluation Reporting System
Officer Evaluation Reporting System Module 1: Overview as of 10 July 2015. 2 Agenda Background Approved Changes ... −Mirrors development of OER with modification by Army Leaders Informed By: SECARMY Guidance 38th CSA reshaping and approval SMA, Board of Directors, and NCO Working Groups Other Services and Industry

U.S. Army Reserve Troop Program Unit (TPU) NCO …
NCO Evaluation Boards 18 March 2021. 2 18 March 2021 Ready Now! Shaping Tomorrow… Laura Hoffman, USARC G -1, PMD-EMB, (910) 570 -8708 ... NCOs may not opt out of consideration by an NCO evaluation board. 4. The Army Reserve will publish analphabetical list of all NCOs who are found MQ and FQ by an evaluation board. NCOs who are MQ will be ...

2021 PROMOTION CONSIDERATION PACKET CHECKLIST
Encl. 7 2021 PROMOTION CONSIDERATION PACKET CHECKLIST Instructions: Optional documentation that will not be included in this packet will be marked N/A in the initials block.

E4 Evaluation Army - netsec.csuci.edu
E4 Evaluation Army: Mastering the Art of Performance Appraisal in the Military Are you ready to revolutionize your unit's performance evaluation process? The E4 Evaluation Army isn't just about filling out forms; it's about fostering growth, improving readiness, and building a stronger, more effective team. This comprehensive

O-6 Draft of TRADOC Pamphlet 350-70-7 - United States Army
Department of the Army TRADOC Pamphlet 350-70-7 . Headquarters, United States Army . Training and Doctrine Command . Fort Eustis, Virginia 23604-5700 ... and evaluation. This guidance supports the concepts outlined in the Army Learning Concept for Training and Education (ALC-TE) and describes the processes that guide curriculum development and ...

DA Form 2166-9 Series - Human Resources Command
Soldiers, the unit, and the Army; demonstrated by the best of the upper third of NCOs of the same grade. o placed 1st of 23 teams in the recent LTG David E. Grange Jr. Best Ranger Competition o nominated and selected over 11 senior NCOs to serve as the Army Corrections Command Operations Sergeant o selected as the Secretary of the Army Career ...

15 SEP 2011 - United States Army
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2011-16 (Changes to the Army Evaluation Reporting System) 1. References: a. AR 623-3 (Evaluation Reporting System), 10 Aug 07. b. DA Pamphlet 623-3 (Evaluation Reporting System), 13 Aug 07. 2. The current DA Form 67-9 (Officer Evaluation Report) (OER) has been in place since 1997 and has served the Army well.

College Credit for Military Training & Experience - North …
Official Evaluation someone else is paying for your evaluation. Upgrade to the Premium Service +$100.00 (Includes Express Mail) $275.00 Official Update (Includes Regular Mail) attended. Order in advance to allow for delivery time. $100.00 Extra Copy of Official Transcript (Includes Regular Mail) $10.00 mailed.

ADMINISTRATION SEPARATION (CHAPTER) INFORMATION
the Army Discharge Review Board or the Army Board for Corrections of Military Records to upgrade your discharge. An ... 10% ((monthly base pay ) (years of service) (12)). EX: E4 with 6 years of service = 10 %( 1322.40) (6) (12) =$9,521.28. Half Separation Pay See DoD Pay Manual paragraph 40411b .

Instructor Observation Rubric - United States Army
1.a. Start Date/Time (YYYY/MM/DD)/(HHMM): _____ 1.b. End Date/Time (YYYY/MM/DD)/(HHMM): _____ 1.c. Instructor's Rank/Last/First/MI: _____ 1.d.

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers CEHR-E Washington, D.C.
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY ER 690-1-500 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers CEHR-E Washington, D.C. 20314-1000 Regulation No. 690-1-500 31 July 2002 ... Questions relating to job evaluation and grade structure will be referred to field MSC, Civilian Personnel Operations Center (CPOC), Civilian Personnel

N O E R (NCOER) - Louisiana
• Army Regulation 623-3, Evaluation Reporting System, 14 June 2019. • Department of the Army Pamphlet 623-3, Evaluation Reporting System, 27 September 2019. • Army Doctrine Publication 6-22, Army Leadership, 31 July 2019. • Noncommissioned Officer Evaluation Report(NCOER) Submission Procedures Memorandum, 1 April 2020.

Defense Primer: Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation …
2 days ago · Title IV: Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation • Army • Navy • Air Force • Space Force • Defense-wide • Operational Test and Evaluation Title V: Revolving and Management Funds •National Defense Sealift Fund Title VI: Other Defense Programs • Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction • • Inspector General RDT&E by ...

ARMY RESERVE ACTIVE GUARD RESERVE (AGR) SELECTION …
a. If current grade is E4, are you able to complete your initial 3-year tour prior to reaching your RCP of 8 years of active service. (i.e., as an E4, must have less than 5 years of active service). YES NO NO NO W 3. Do you meet the retention medical standards of AR 40-501 (physical exam)? (AR 135-18, Table 2-1, Rule C) YES NO NA 4.

Promotion Packet Composition, Elections and Preferences
Indicate below if employed as an Army Reserve civilian employee with a dual status condition of employment. I understand that I incur a 1-year position obligation to report to and serve in the duty position into which promoted before voluntary reassignment. I understand that the first General Officer of the position to which I am promoted

Department of the Army *TRADOC Regulation 350-18
This regulation prescribes policy and guidance for The Army School System (TASS). Applicability. This regulation applies to Regular Army (RA), Army National Guard (ARNG), and U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) agencies responsible for managing or conducting training and education courses. Proponent and exception authority.

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD ENLISTED PROMOTION POINT …
Jun 22, 2020 · ARMY NATIONAL GUARD SENIOR ENLISTED WORKSHEET Sergeant First Class through Sergeant Major Boards The proponent agency is ARNG-HRH. The prescribing directive is NGR 600-200. SECTION I - PERSONNEL SYSTEM DATA. 1) Name: 2) Rank: 3) Unit: 4) CPMOS: 5) PULHES: 6) DOB: 7) DOR: 8) PEBD: 9) BESD: 10) ETS:

Evaluation Entry System (EES) - Human Resources Command
3 Accessing the Evaluation Entry System (EES) Users must use the https://evaluations.hrc.army.mil/ web address to access EES. Users will s elect their Digital Certificate and select “OK.” After users select the appropriate CAC card certificate, the web address will take users to

Army Regulation 1–201 - Army Inspector General
throughout the Army to contact specific IG staff sections for information about previously conducted in-spections to avoid duplication of effort and to share results. b. Chief, National Guard Bureau. The CNGB will— (1) Ensure that Army inspection policy is implemented within the Army National Guard (ARNG).

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY U.S. ARMY HUMAN …
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY U.S. ARMY HUMAN RESOURCES COMMAND 1600 SPEARHEAD DIVISION AVENUE DEPARTMENT 472 FORT KNOX, KY 40122-5407 ... Noncommissioned Officer (NCO) Evaluation Boards (Monthly Promotion Selection Policy) - Effective with the May 2021 promotion month, new monthly promotion timelines for promotions …

Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career …
C, D, and E for the Active Army, the Army National Guard/Army National Guard of the United States, and the U.S. Army Reserve. Contents (Listed by paragraph and page number) Part One Philosophy and Management, page 1 Chapter 1 Introduction, page 1 Purpose † 1–1, page 1 References † 1–2, page 1 Explanation of abbreviations and terms † 1 ...

Module 3: NCOER Support Form & Grade Plate NCOERs
As mentioned on the previous slide, DA Form 2166-9-1A, the NCOER Support Form, will align with Army leadership doctrine. In addition, the rated NCO’s current Military Education Level (MEL) and Structured ... name and SSN on the evaluation report, rank and date of rank, branch or MOS data, period covered and nonrated time; the rating officials ...

BUPERSINST 1610.10D BUPERS INSTRUCTION 1610.10D …
Subj: NAVY PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM Ref: (a) OPNAVINST 6110.1J (b) NAVPERS 15560D, Naval Military Personnel Manual (MILPERSMAN) (c) BUPERSINST 1430.16F ... The rater for personnel E1-E4 can be an E6 or civilian equivalent (GS-5). For personnel E5-E6, the rater should be a . BUPERSINST 1610.10D 1 May 2015 3

Fiscal Year (FY) 2025 Budget Estimates UNCLASSIFIED …
The purpose of this document is to provide summary information concerning the Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army program. The descriptive summaries are comprised of R-2 (Army RDT&E Budget Item Justification – program element level), R-2A (Army

Department of the Army *TRADOC Pamphlet 350-70-3
Department of the Army *TRADOC Pamphlet 350-70-3 . Headquarters, United States Army . Training and Doctrine Command . Fort Eustis, Virginia 23604-5700 . 20 November 2023 ... evaluation (ADDIE) process supporting education and training. Faculty includes instructors, facilitators, developers, writers, training and instructional development ...

Section IV Chapter 12 - United States Army
The use of Y1 must be according to Department of the Army authority contained in table 12-3--MOS Authorized Use of ASI Y1--Transition. ... development, testing, management, standardization, and evaluation of instructional systems and methods. Requires thorough familiarity with the Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation ...

The Operations Process - United States Army
FM 6-0 (Mission Command: Command and Control of Army Forces), 11 Aug 03 Painting by Christopher Thiel. Table of Contents Design Receipt of Mission Mission Analysis Course of Action Development Course of Action Analysis ... Develop COA evaluation criteria Step 18. Issue a warning order 10 9 10 15 16 26 26 24 23 22 22 20 19 18 17 16 28 27 27 ...

LEADER AND SOLDIER GUIDE FOR BOARD ACTIONS - United …
May 16, 2023 · Added promotion point update for Army recruiting Ribbon. FY 2022 . 1. Region elections added to bottom of checklist. 2. Added declination remarks section to NGB Form 4100-1A. ... Section 4.3 Specialist/Corporal Promotion Evaluation Report. 4.3.1 NGIL 2166-8-1 . 4.3.2 Part 1 – Administrative Data . 4.3.3 Part 2 – Authentication .

E4 Evaluation Form Army (2024) - netsec.csuci.edu
The E4 evaluation form, like all Army performance evaluations, is a critical tool used to assess a soldier's performance, potential, and overall contribution to the unit. It’s not just a box-ticking exercise; it’s a reflection of your dedication, skills,

The Army Body Composition Program - United States Army
o Incorporates guidance for uploading Army Body Composition Program documents into the Interactive Personnel Electronics Records Management System (paras : 2–15: i: and 2-15 ... counseling, and evaluation for Regular Army and Reserve Component Soldiers on active duty • 3 – 6, page . 5. Actions, counseling, and evaluations for Reserve ...

Army Regulation 15–1 - United States Army
• Specifies responsibilities for Army Designated Federal officers (para 1 – 10). • Updates member nominations policy (para 2 – 4). • Removes nonvoting consultant nominations policy (para 2 – 5). • Updates references (appendix A). • Updates Internal Control Evaluation Test questions (para B – 4). • Updates Glossary. #_Toc1–6G

17-13 - United States Army
Jan 19, 2023 · CENTER FOR ARMY LESSONS LEARNED Center For Army Lessons Learned CALL Director COL Michael F. Pappal CALL Analyst CPT Ryan St. Jean Contributing Authors MAJ Walter Engle Jonathan C. Fruendt, M.D. The Secretary of the Army has determined that the publication of this periodical is necessary in the transaction of the public business as required

Weapons Qualification/Promotion Points to E5/SGT for …
DA Form 88-R (MAR 07) (Pistol) DA Form 5704(MAY 08) Alternate Pistol DA Form 7304-R(AUG 06) (M249 AR) CID (Practical Pistol) (JUL 08) FLVA FORM 19-10 (AUG

Personnel Procurement - U.S. Army Recruiting Command
U.S. Army Recruiting Command Liaisons at U.S. Army Reception Battalions (RECBN), page 127. Chapter 23 Occupational Physical Assessment Test (OPAT), page 130. ... Tier Evaluation Workflow, page 104. Figure 17-1. FSTP Decision Matrix, page 112. Figure 25-1. OCS & WOFT Selection Process, page 144. Glossary of Terms .